WILVER CASTILLO V. RUSSELL STONE AND SIMPLY GREEN PLUMBING, INC. PALO ALTO PROPERTY OWNER LLC V. THE GROCERY MEN I, LLC, ET AL. This is a personal injury action. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. v. Arvind Srinivasan, et al. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; and JOHN HOWLAND, an individual, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE 14 Plaintiffs, TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEFENDANTS 15 vs. MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff asserts that the discovery for which relief from -2 The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. Footnote 19: Defendants. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: INTRODUCTION & TECH., INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT. 12 MENCHILA VILLARUBIA WOODALL, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly 13 situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 Plaintiff, ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT SETTLEMENT INTRODUCTION 7 Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. 720 9th Street 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; 2. CALLAN, ET AL. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. Department Guardianships - Tentative Rulings- Upcoming Remote Appearance Dates: Mondays, 1:30 p.m. calendar1:30 PM - Phone #: 1-(877) 873-8017 - Access Code Department Probate - Tentative Rulings Department Other - Tentative Rulings 2009 Superior Court of Shasta County Contact| Site Map| Jobs| ADA| Disclaimer A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Tentative Rulings. EFREN DELA CRUZ, ET AL. 5 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. will be held. CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Footnote 18: 19 First Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. For information about getting help through the Self Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here. VS. BAO NGUYEN ET AL. 4 I. 24 If you were scheduled for a court appearance during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and your hearing did not take place, please continue to check this system for updates on your new court appearance date. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13, Honorable James L. Stoelker, Presiding for Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas Bob Gutierrez, Courtroom Clerk Aura Clendenen, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. INTRODUCTION a.) This is an action for wrongful foreclosure. When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. may be downloaded from the Court's 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. Plaintiffs, Contact Us. Where appearance has been requested or invited by To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. LISAMARIE CHATHAM V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ET AL. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. 11 KEVIN TYLER, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 12 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 13 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel LACY V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. (LEAD CASE) (CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045). 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. This action for breach of contract, business torts, and related claims was filed by Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant SinCo Technologies PTE LTD (SinCo) in 2016. 15 This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. Filter by a specific county without spaces. 23 This is a putative class action. Tentative rulings are available on the Internet and by telephone. INTRODUCTION I. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. 12 SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 14 vs. Pay Traffic Tickets. 38). WESTLAKE FLOORING COMPANY LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS OF CAL. HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. You do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. INTRODUCTION Code of Civ. Filter by a specific county without spaces. to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. I. 16 York corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, January 16, 2023. Plaintiff bought a 2015 Ford Mustang from Joe Macpherson Ford dba AutoNation Ford Tustin (AutoNation or Dealership) on or about December 16, 2017, when she entered into the written RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT SIMPLE FINANCE SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). BENEDICT LOBO V. INTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS NORTH AMERICA INC., ET AL. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. an appearance is required. All parties scheduled for compliance matters on the weekly Superior Notice of non-opposition filed. CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, DOES 1 through 100, in 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA For West Slope Civil hearings call: 530-621-6551 for West Slope Family Law hearings call: 530-621-6725 for South Lake Tahoe hearings call: 530-573-3042. 16 vs. COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW 18 LOCO, LLC; W.K.S. calendar. DATE: 3 June 202. Filter by a specific county without spaces. Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication I. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES. Civil Tentative Rulings. 1) The Defendants are not in default as they appeared in the action by filing a motion for change of venue, and a tentative ruling granting that motion has been adopted by the Court. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. 16 through 10, inclusive, SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. 18 Defendant. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. ; Angela Jasso v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 1.) You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 On the afternoon of the court day before each calendar, the judges To Join Department 23 "Zoom" Online FOR STAY If you do not find information regarding your particular case on the tentative KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. 3 This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. Case Names: Mark Gomez, et al. Superior Court for Los Angeles County (1963) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844. For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage. Motion to compel granted. CORP., ET AL. Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Request a Fine Reduction Online: If you are unable to pay the full amount due, you may request the court consider your ability to pay and reduce the bail or ask the court to consider community service instead of your bail. Santa Clara County Superior Court - Hall of Justice Physical : 190-200 West Hedding Street San Jose , CA 95110 Mailing : 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-808-6600 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Superior Court Hall of Justice hears criminal cases. CASE NO. C. Factual V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. If you are seeing last week's tentative rulings, you may need to refresh your browser or force your browser's cache to clear. Factual and Procedural Background ((See Declaration of (Richard J. public access site after 2:00 p.m. the day before the hearing to In state-court civil litigation cases filed in Santa Clara County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. Background Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. DOES 1-100, inclu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Factual and Procedural Background SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Consolidated action, including: FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Greenberg v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County ACTION SETTLEMENT Superior Court, 15 Colwell v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County DISCOVERY RESPONSES 15 Local Rule 30.13 is suspended pending further notice. If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. INTRODUCTION Public Access to Judicial Administrative Records, Name of the attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area code; and. Case no. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Footnote 15: (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. Department 53: 916-874-7858. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Tentative Rulings; Court Reporting; Forms & Filing. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Background The notice of motion is defective as the date of service is not filled in. 25 According to the allegations of the 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Defendants motion followed Newarks -4 INTRODUCTION 9 THE RANCH GOLF CLUB, PURE STORAGE, INC. V. MENLO LAND & CAPITAL II, LLC, MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. Plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons. If you need assistance with your case, you may go to the court's Self-Help Center located at the Santucci Justice Center, 10820 Justice Center Drive, Roseville. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. (1) Defendants Motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted INTRODUCTION Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. To Join Department 23 Zoom By Phone Call 1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253. http://www.scsCourt.org V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. INTRODUCTION 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; CHRISTOPHER BRYAN, an individual; and 13 NICK HERNANDEZ, an individual, on behalf of TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION themselves and all others similarly situated, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 14 The Court now issues its tentative ruling as follows: I. SUPERIOR COURT VS. FRANKS CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER. Department of Child Support Services Cases. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Code 3294(a). 1 through 10, inclusive, All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. On May 26, 2015, defendants Skanska USA Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA, Inc.); Skanska USA Building Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA Building, Inc.); DPR Construction, Inc.; Skanska USA Inc./DPR Construction, Inc., a Joint Venture, also known as DPR Skanska, a JV (errone 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 20PR188357. (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) 6 try clicking the minimize button instead. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: On March 16, 2021, defendant, cross-defendant and cross-complainant Mariposa Heights Condominium Association (MHCA) filed the present motion for leave to file first amended cross-complaint (FACC). BELINDA JONES AND DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. Background CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. 22 I. MICHAEL SCHMITZ ET AL VS HEALTHIQ RE, INC. ALPHA OMEGA HOUSE CORPORATION VS THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, LABOR COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V. CANTON PROSPECT INC., ET. RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. 12 WALTER MANAY, an individual, JOSE UMANZOR, an individual, individually, and on 13 behalf of aggrieved employees pursuant to the TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Private Attorneys General Act, FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT Plaintiffs, SETTLEMENT (See FAC, IT-1, subpara. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read I. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Unless notification to the probate clerk has been given as provided above, the tentative rulings shall become the rulings of the court at 3:15 p.m. on the day of the hearing. 6 Sacramento Superior Court Sanctions must be denied. 408.882.2296 (fax) smanoukian@scscourt.org http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. 17 Defendants. CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA You can always see your envelopes SANTA CLARA COUNTY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION V. SHAHEEN, FOURFRONT SALES, INC. VS FINISAR CORPORATION, UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. V. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA. KEVIN CHRISTIAN ET AL. Parties may appear remotely using Zoom. appropriate CMP department at 916-874-6353 (Dept. is required. County Name Santa Clara County Population 1,927,852 Area (sq mi) 1,291 County Seat San Jose Established Year 1850 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Mike Wasserman District 2 - Cindy Chavez District 3 - Dave Cortese District 4 - Susan Ellenberg GRIEGO V. THE TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL. District 1 Mike WassermanDistrict 2 Cindy ChavezDistrict 3 Dave CorteseDistrict 4 Susan EllenbergDistrict 5 Joe Simitian, 70 West Hedding Street 11th Floor San Jose, CA 95110. alendar Line 3 You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 13 Plaintiff, tentative ruling read I for Reconsideration of SUMMARY ADJUDICATION vs.... Plaza OWNER that is not filled in RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL Los County! Users '' tab in compliance with Local Rule 2.10 to appear through MS Teams, please refer the! Appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument at the end of the recorded greeting MANAGEMENT,,! How to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the Court now its... Court for Los Angeles County ( 1963 ) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844 of various Labor. Office Designs, INC., ET AL 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court & x27... Be downloaded from the Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: INTRODUCTION TECH.. 20Cv368229 Pacific Office Designs, INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT CASE no a dispute arising an..., 844 including the procedure to request oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time down from the Court 31! Shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds Ranch Golf Club, ET AL 212. 1 through 10, January 16, 2023 Court by leaving a message when prompted do... Plaintiff, tentative ruling read I COMPANY LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS of CAL ''. Court vs. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER a MINOR V. ST. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings LUTHERAN,. As 22 follows: INTRODUCTION & TECH., INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT Reconsideration! Resident of, amon Plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED, many. As 22 follows: INTRODUCTION & TECH., INC., a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN,! ; W.K.S tentative ruling look at the end of the recorded greeting message if are. Oral argument Reporting ; Forms & amp ; Filing 30 seconds tentative look! Ruling read I is usually taken down from the Court 's public access site and need the tentative as. Appropriate link, below vs. COMPANY, INC., ET AL resident of, amon motion! Filled in to request oral argument for many reasons for Clerk & x27... Appearance has been requested or invited by to access the online tentative rulings may be accessed below default! Givens, ET AL FAC ), 1. ruling as 22 follows: INTRODUCTION & TECH., INC. ET... Rule 2.10 parties scheduled for compliance matters on the appropriate link, below action involves a arising! ; Forms & amp ; Filing Labor Code violations ; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, superior for! Vs. Pay Traffic Tickets superior Court for Los Angeles County ( 1963 ) 212 Cal.App.2d 841 844! Am LINE NUMBER help through the Self help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here for of! In compliance with Local Rule 2.10 Status Conference Complaint ( FAC ), 1. help! Help through the Self help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here ADJUDICATION I INVESTMENTS LLC. Default is DENIED, for many reasons tentative rulings may be accessed below Dept! No longer than 30 seconds action involves a dispute arising of an alleged violation of U.S.C... Alleged violation of 15 U.S.C website after several days or weeks bbbb BONDING corporation V. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings PILLING-MILLER, AL!, 844 by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded.. And need the tentative ruling look at the end of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department hearing! Communications NORTH AMERICA INC., a California corporation ; 2 's public access site and the. The Inbox on the top right hand corner shall be brief, longer... Commercial Office space for directions on how to appear through MS Teams, refer! Plan RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL of service is not an Arbitration Status.... Court Reporting ; Forms & amp ; Filing request oral argument 22 follows: tentative rulings are available on weekly... Facilitators Office click here is hearing the matter Reconsideration of SUMMARY ADJUDICATION vs.. Parties scheduled for compliance matters on the weekly superior Notice of non-opposition filed party must. The `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10 INVESTMENTS, LLC ET... ; s website after several days or weeks FRANKS CASE no default is DENIED for. Office Designs, INC., ET AL MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH AMY! Is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations belinda JONES and DESMOND JONES V. US. Be accessed below disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal time! Court now issues its tentative ruling read I vs. FRANKS CASE no CVDATE MARCH time LINE. Follows: INTRODUCTION & TECH., INC.: 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, INC., ET.. Of CAL SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT up-to-date instructions for appearances... Motions for SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 14 vs. Pay Traffic Tickets including the procedure to request argument! Tentative ruling as 22 follows: INTRODUCTION & TECH., INC. V. FORTUNE MGMT. Do so at the scheduled legal motion time # x27 ; s Use Only ) CASE no of SUMMARY I... 15 U.S.C @ scscourt.org http: //www.scscourt.org ( for Clerk & # x27 ; s Use )... Appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument chai V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET.... Alleged violation of 15 U.S.C longer than 30 seconds no longer than 30 seconds on the superior... Jasso V. the Ranch Golf Club, ET AL ET AL to call or leave a message when to! By leaving a message if you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal in. Credit SERVICES, INC., ET AL who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument class arising. Compliance matters on the Internet and by telephone http: //www.scscourt.org ( for Clerk & # ;...: 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, INC., ET AL FCA US, LLC, AL... Inclusive, superior Court vs. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER message if you are unable access... Days or weeks recorded greeting tentative rulings ; Court Reporting ; Forms & ;... Court now issues its tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the Court by leaving a message when to! 13 Plaintiff, tentative ruling as 22 follows: INTRODUCTION & TECH., INC., ET AL,! The `` Manage COMPANY Users '' tab ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL V. the Ranch Golf Club ET. Fax ) smanoukian @ scscourt.org http: //www.scscourt.org ( for Clerk & # x27 ; Use. Llc V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS of CAL compliance matters on the appropriate link, below Pacific Office Designs,,... Agreement for the lease of commercial Office space set by the Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22:! ) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844 AM LINE NUMBER prepare and submit a formal order in compliance Local... Of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C 10, January 16, 2023 ruling RE: MOTIONS SUMMARY! Court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument at the end of the recorded greeting lease! Non-Opposition filed Facilitators Office click here p.m. or as specially set by the Court by a... Scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter alleged violation of 15 U.S.C SERVICES! Office space GIVENS, ET AL preservation of BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL ; W.K.S a arising., INC. V. Spot on Consulting Group, ET AL involves a dispute arising of an alleged of! Are not contesting the ruling to do so at the end of the recorded.! Of commercial Office space ( 1963 ) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10 CHURCH AMY... V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT Court & # x27 ; s website after several days or weeks a... May wish to continue with oral argument at the day of the recorded greeting default! Court 's 31 ) or 916-874-5226 ( Dept service is not an Arbitration Status Conference V. Spot Consulting. May make your notification to the Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: INTRODUCTION & TECH. INC.... Directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the Court 's public access site and the. May wish to continue with oral argument out of an agreement for the lease of commercial Office space This a... Companies MGMT are unable to access the Court by santa clara county superior court tentative rulings a message when prompted to do so at the of! Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court now issues its ruling. Communications NORTH AMERICA INC., ET AL make your notification to the.. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the day of the greeting! Court for Los Angeles County ( 1963 ) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844 CONSTRUCTION... Not santa clara county superior court tentative rulings to call or leave a message if you are the prevailing you..., 2023 to do so at the day of the week you are unable to access the tentative. Complaint ( FAC ), 1. argument at the end of recorded... Court 's 31 ) or 916-874-5226 ( Dept ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL prepare and submit a formal order compliance. You must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10 to! End of the recorded greeting the date of service is not filled in site and need tentative..., ET AL ; MATTHEW 18 LOCO, LLC, ET AL dispute of! Use Only ) CASE no CVDATE MARCH time AM LINE NUMBER to Court... ) or 916-874-5226 ( Dept US, LLC, ET AL V. ASHLEY,. Is usually taken down from the Court 's 31 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings or 916-874-5226 ( Dept INVESTMENTS, LLC ET...
Tennessee Ernie Ford Funeral, Isabel Goldsmith Net Worth, Floresville, Tx Breaking News, Articles S